top of page

Arizona Workers' Compensation: The Employer's Conveyance Exception Explained

Writer: Christopher S. Norton, Esq.
Christopher S. Norton, Esq.
Jun 8
2 min read

In Arizona, the "going and coming rule" generally dictates that an employee is not considered to be in the course of employment while traveling to or from work. The reasoning is that commuting risks are usually the same as those faced by the general public rather than specific incidents of employment. However, the employer’s conveyance exception provides a vital path to coverage for workers injured during their commute.


What is the Employer’s Conveyance Exception?



Key Factors for Coverage

  • Employer Control: The most critical element is that the vehicle must be under the employer's control, such as a company shuttle, a bus, or a truck assigned to a foreman.

  • Control vs. Allowance: This exception is distinct from cases where an employer merely provides a travel allowance or a vehicle that remains under the employee's own control. In those allowance-based scenarios, the courts apply a "totality of the circumstances" test to see if the travel provided a substantial benefit to the employer.

  • Custom and Practice: A tacit agreement to provide transportation can be found if it is an established practice, such as a worker regularly riding to a job site in a company truck assigned to a supervisor.


Negligence and Traffic Violations

In Arizona, an employee’s negligence or violation of traffic laws while driving a company vehicle generally does not bar recovery. Negligence in the performance of an authorized duty (like driving) is considered a risk incidental to employment rather than an act that removes the worker from it. Even if a worker causes an accident by running a stop sign or speeding, the injury remains compensable because workers' compensation is a no-fault system.


Important Limitations and Deviations

Coverage under the employer's conveyance exception can be lost if there is a substantial deviation for purely personal reasons. If a worker detours from an authorized business route to visit a personal location, such as a summer cabin, they are removed from the course of employment until they return to the authorized route. Furthermore, if an employer strictly prohibits personal use of a company vehicle, an accident occurring during such use may be found non-compensable.


Why It Matters

Establishing that an injury occurred in an employer's conveyance ensures that the worker is eligible for medical benefits and lost wage compensation without having to prove the employer was at fault. Understanding these nuances is essential for both employers and employees to navigate the complexities of Arizona’s workers’ compensation landscape.

Comments


bottom of page