top of page

Carvana LLC v. Fielder - Memorandum Decision - Arizona Court of Appeals - May 29, 2025 ​

  • Writer: Christopher S. Norton, Esq.
    Christopher S. Norton, Esq.
  • Jul 5
  • 2 min read

ree

Facts: Luke Fielder, a technician at Carvana LLC, claimed he sustained a lower back injury while replacing a 50-pound car battery between May 8 and May 12, 2023. He initially attributed his pain to a kidney stone and continued working despite worsening symptoms. ​ Medical evaluations later revealed advanced degenerative disc disease and disc herniation, which a doctor linked to a lifting injury at work. ​ Fielder reported the injury as work-related on May 29, 2023. ​ Carvana denied the claim, arguing the injury was not work-related and was reported late. ​ The Industrial Commission of Arizona (ICA) ruled in favor of Fielder, finding his injury compensable. ​ Carvana appealed the decision. ​


Issue(s):

  1. Was Fielder’s lower back injury work-related? ​

  2. Did Fielder fail to timely report the injury, thereby precluding benefits? ​


Holding: The Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the ICA’s decision, finding substantial evidence supported the award. ​ The court deferred to the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) credibility determinations and factual findings, which concluded that Fielder’s injury was work-related and timely reported once he became aware of its cause. ​


Key Takeaways:

  1. Credibility of Testimony: The court deferred to the ALJ’s assessment of Fielder’s credibility, which was pivotal in determining the injury’s work-related nature despite conflicting evidence from co-workers. ​

  2. Timely Reporting: The court upheld the ALJ’s finding that Fielder reported the injury promptly after learning it was work-related, satisfying reporting requirements. ​

  3. Standard of Review: The court emphasized its role in deferring to the ALJ’s factual findings and resolving conflicts in evidence, affirming the decision as long as a reasonable theory of evidence supports it. ​

  4. No Debatable Issues: Carvana failed to present debatable issues on appeal, and Fielder’s failure to file an answering brief did not constitute a confession of error. ​



Comments


bottom of page